MYCrave Consultancy & Services
+91 76006 90996 Free consultation
For universities, colleges and research institutions

Assessment frameworks ask for evidence. An organised IPR ecosystem is how you produce it.

Innovation and research indicators are documented, not declared. We help institutions build the policy, the workflow and the records that make their IP activity demonstrable — and we are careful never to promise an outcome that only an assessor can decide.

  • 12+ years of experience
  • 70+ IP Cells established
  • 4,200+ seminars delivered
  • 2,00,000+ students addressed
Request an accreditation readiness consultation or message us on WhatsApp

Free consultation, no obligation

Tell us what you have built. We will tell you honestly what it needs — and what it costs.

We reply within one working day. Everything you share stays confidential.

What institutions run into

IP activity that leaves no trail

Filings happen in pockets, records sit on individual laptops, and when documentation is needed nobody can assemble a defensible picture of what the institution has actually done.

No IP policy, so no ownership position

Without a written policy covering student work, faculty output, sponsored research and consultancy, disclosures stall on the question of who owns what — and commercialisation never starts.

Faculty who were never trained to spot it

Staff are asked to identify protectable work having never been shown what that looks like in their own discipline.

Applications that lapse quietly

Filings are made for the count, then examination reports go unanswered and applications die without anyone noticing.

Research that never reaches industry

Even granted IP sits unused because no one owns the transfer step or knows how to price it.

How a structured IP Cell addresses this

01

An IP policy written for your statutes

Ownership, revenue sharing, student and faculty rights, sponsored and consultancy output — drafted to fit your institution rather than lifted from a template.

02

A disclosure-to-filing workflow

A defined route from idea to decision: who discloses, who evaluates, who decides, and by when.

03

Faculty and student capacity building

Training that teaches staff to recognise protectable work, and awareness programmes that generate a disclosure pipeline.

04

Filings prosecuted through to grant

Drafting, filing and replies to examination reports by registered patent agents, so applications progress instead of lapsing.

05

Auditable records and evidence

Registers, disclosure logs, decision trails and status dashboards — documentation your assessment team can actually produce on request.

06

Commercialisation and industry connect

Listing, valuation and transfer through IPBANK INDIA, with the legal and payment infrastructure already in place.

The institutional IPR development model

  1. 1

    Institutional IPR and innovation audit

    What exists today: filings, policy, people, processes and gaps.

  2. 2

    IP policy and governance framework

    Drafted, reviewed and taken through your approval process.

  3. 3

    IP Cell establishment or strengthening

    Structure, roles, decision authority and operating workflow.

  4. 4

    Faculty and student awareness

    Training programmes and seminars delivered on campus or online.

  5. 5

    Innovation disclosure and screening

    A disclosure drive, then structured evaluation of what came in.

  6. 6

    Search, drafting, filing and prosecution

    Handled by registered agents, through to grant.

  7. 7

    Commercialisation and industry connect

    Licensing and transfer routes for what is worth commercialising.

  8. 8

    Monitoring, dashboards and evidence documentation

    Ongoing status tracking and reporting formats for management and assessment use.

Success stories

What protection looks like in practice

Real work from our filings across manufacturing, education, pharma and consumer products. Client names appear only where we have permission to use them.

Questions we are asked most

Will this improve our NAAC, NBA or NIRF score?

We will not claim that, and you should be cautious of anyone who does. Scores are determined by assessors against criteria that change. What a well-managed IPR ecosystem does is produce genuine innovation outcomes and the documentation to evidence them. Any framework-specific claim should be checked against the current official criteria before you rely on it.

Does filing patents automatically raise an accreditation score?

No. Filing counts are one input among many, and filing without prosecution, records or outcomes evidences very little. The value is in a functioning system, not in the number alone.

We already have an IP cell. Can you work with it?

Yes, and that is often the better route. We audit what exists, find where the process actually breaks, and fix that rather than rebuilding from scratch.

How long does it take to see results?

Policy and structure are usually in place within a few weeks of the audit. Disclosures typically follow the first awareness programme. Grants take as long as the patent office takes, which is outside anyone's control.

What does it cost?

It depends on institution size, departments involved and whether filings are included. We provide a written proposal after the audit, with filing fees itemised separately from the programme fee.

Who owns the IP that results?

Whatever your policy says — which is precisely why we draft the policy first. Most institutions adopt a shared model between institution and inventor with defined revenue sharing.

Not happy with something? We keep a dedicated complaint-handling team, separate from the people delivering your matter. Every complaint gets a reference number and an independent review. Raise a complaint or send feedback.

Ready to protect it?

A short conversation is usually enough to tell you whether you have something protectable, which route fits, and what it will cost.

Request an accreditation readiness consultation Call +91 76006 90996
Call WhatsApp Free consultation