Teen and Child Inventors: Chester Greenwood, Richie Stachowski and Kelly Reinhart
On this page

Age is not a requirement for inventorship. In India, a natural person can be named as an inventor and applicants who are individuals pay the lowest government fee. The obstacle for young inventors is almost never the law — it is that nobody told them their idea was protectable.

Here are three inventors who were children when they made something people still buy.

Chester Greenwood — earmuffs, at fifteen

Chester Greenwood was a teenager in Maine when he made a pair of ear coverings to keep his ears warm while skating, using wire and fur. He was granted a US patent for an improved ear protector while still in his teens, and went on to manufacture them for decades.

The lesson is not that a child invented something. It is that the invention was a small, practical improvement to an ordinary problem — which is what most granted patents actually are.

Richie Stachowski — Water Talkie, at ten

Richie Stachowski was ten when he developed a device that allowed people to talk to each other underwater. He patented it, produced it, and sold it into national retailers before selling the business.

What made it work was not complexity. It was identifying a specific problem — that you cannot hold a conversation underwater — and building the simplest thing that solved it.

Kelly Reinhart — the T-Pak, at six

Kelly Reinhart was six when she came up with a wearable pack designed to be worn around the torso, so children could carry their belongings without a bag. The design was protected and commercialised.

At six years old, the invention was an observation about her own daily inconvenience. Most good product designs begin exactly there.

What young inventors in India should know

Publishing first destroys patentability. A science fair, an exhibition or a social media post is a public disclosure. Once your invention is public without a filing, the patent is usually gone.

A design registration may fit better than a patent. If what is new is how the product looks rather than how it works, design registration is faster and cheaper.

Individual applicants pay far less. Government fees for a natural person are a small fraction of the corporate rate.

The student stays the inventor. Naming and ownership are separate questions. A school or college may have a policy on ownership, but the person who invented it is the inventor.

If you are a student, a parent or a teacher looking at something a child has made and wondering whether it is protectable, the honest answer is: it might be, and it costs nothing to ask before you show it to the world.

Need help protecting your work in India?

Talk to an IP expert

About this article

Published byMYCrave Consultancy & Services
Reviewed byDhruv Brahmbhatt
Originally published03 February 2017

This article was first published on the MYCrave blog and has been migrated to the IP Knowledge Bank; its original publication date is shown above. Spotted an error? Write to info@mycrave.co.in. How we research, review and update this library is set out in our editorial policy. This is general information about Indian IP law and procedure, not advice on your specific matter.