On this page
A trademark search costs a fraction of a filing and saves the entire filing when it comes back badly. It is the cheapest decision point in the whole process.
Quick answer
Search the Trade Marks Registry database for identical and similar marks in the classes you intend to file in, then search the market for unregistered use. If a confusingly similar mark already exists in your class, choose a different name — filing anyway generally wastes money and time.
What you are actually looking for
Not just identical names. The legal test is likelihood of confusion among average consumers, which covers marks similar in sound, appearance or meaning:
- Phonetic similarity — marks that sound alike when spoken, which matters enormously in a multilingual market.
- Visual similarity — similar spelling, letter patterns or logo elements.
- Conceptual similarity — different words with the same meaning, including across languages.
- Related goods or services — confusion can arise across neighbouring classes, not only within one.
Where to search
- Trade Marks Registry public search. The official database, searchable by wordmark, phonetic similarity, class and proprietor. Start here.
- Across classes, not just yours. Check adjacent classes where your goods or services could overlap.
- Company name databases. An existing company name can support common-law rights even without registration.
- Domain names and marketplaces. Active unregistered use creates rights that can defeat a later registration.
- General web and social search. Someone trading under the name for years has a claim regardless of the register.
The public database shows registered and pending marks. It does not show unregistered common-law use — which in India can still defeat your application through opposition. That gap is why a database search alone is not a clean bill of health.
Judging what you find
- Identical mark, same class, registered: stop. Choose another name.
- Similar mark, same class: high risk. Assess phonetic and conceptual closeness carefully before proceeding.
- Identical mark, unrelated class: often coexistable, unless the other mark is well-known — well-known marks receive protection across classes.
- Similar mark, abandoned or lapsed: lower risk, but check status carefully rather than assuming.
- Nothing on the register but active market use: real risk of opposition from the prior user.
Descriptiveness: the other failure mode
A name can be entirely available and still be refused. Marks that merely describe the goods — the quality, quantity, purpose or geographic origin — face objection under Section 9 on distinctiveness grounds. "Fresh Bakery" for a bakery is available in the sense that nobody owns it, and refusable for exactly the same reason. Invented or arbitrary names are both easier to register and stronger to enforce.
A practical search workflow
- List your name variants, including likely misspellings and phonetic equivalents.
- Identify your class or classes based on actual goods and services, plus where you plan to expand.
- Run wordmark and phonetic searches in each class.
- Run the same searches in adjacent classes.
- Search company registries, domains and marketplaces for unregistered use.
- Assess distinctiveness — would this be refused as descriptive even if available?
- Record what you found and when. This becomes useful evidence later.
How MYCrave can help
Our search and report covers the register, adjacent classes and common-law use, with a written view on risk rather than a raw list of hits. Where a name is high-risk we say so plainly — telling a client to rename before they have printed packaging is worth far more than filing an application that will be opposed.
Frequently asked questions
Can I do a trademark search myself?
How long does a professional search take?
Does a clean search guarantee registration?
Should I search in more than one class?
What if a similar mark is registered but not in use?
Can I trademark a name already used as a domain?
Talk to a MYCrave IP expert. Free initial consultation, complete confidentiality.
Book a ConsultationAbout this guide
- The Trade Marks Act, 1999 and the Trade Marks Rules, 2017
- Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks — official fee schedule and forms
- Trade Marks Registry public search and journal
Statutory fees, forms and timelines are revised periodically. Figures here reflect the position at the review date above — confirm the current schedule before you act. Official material is published by the Office of the Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks.
Spotted an error? Tell us at info@mycrave.co.in and we will correct it. How we research, review and update this library is set out in our editorial policy. This guide is general information about Indian IP law and procedure, not advice on your specific matter.