Fake Patents in India: How a ₹4,000 “International Patent” Can End Your Academic Career

A message lands in a departmental WhatsApp group: "International patent — grant guaranteed within weeks. ₹4,000 per inventor slot. Useful for API score, NAAC, NIRF." For a lecturer facing an appraisal deadline, it reads like a shortcut. What it actually is: an unexamined foreign design registration dressed up as a patent — and a purchase that sits on a public register, under your name, forever. This guide explains how the scheme works, why it is so easy to expose, and what it can cost an academic career.

Quick answer

The "₹4,000 international patent" being sold to Indian academics is not a patent. In almost every documented case it is a UK registered design — a form of IP that protects only the appearance of a product, is granted without any examination of novelty or inventive step, and is typically issued in under two weeks. A 2025 study in the International Journal for Educational Integrity identified 3,065 such registrations filed by just eight firms since January 2023 — roughly 3.3% of all UK design registrations in that period — almost exclusively on behalf of Indian academics. Because every design register is public and searchable, these purchases are trivially discoverable, and discovery can mean misconduct proceedings, withdrawn promotions, and permanent reputational damage.

The ₹4,000 pitch: what is actually being sold

The agencies behind the scheme operate openly. They advertise on YouTube, Facebook, Telegram and WhatsApp — often in Hindi — promising "UK design patents" and "international patents" with guaranteed grant. The product is an inventorship slot: your name added to a filing you had nothing to do with. Documented advertisements priced slots at ₹3,500 to ₹4,000 per position, with the first-named "lead inventor" slot costing more.

The mechanics are an assembly line. A blank "invention" template circulates by email — in one documented case, a professor at a Secunderabad engineering college circulated a menu of nearly 200 ready-made "inventions" to academics across India. Buyers pick a slot, pay, and the pooled money funds one cheap foreign filing. A few weeks later a certificate arrives, and a line item appears on half a dozen CVs: "International patent granted."

A design registration is not a patent

The entire scheme rests on one word doing dishonest work. Here is the actual difference:

Because nothing is examined, effectively anything can be registered. Researchers who studied these filings found registrations whose images were absurd on their face: an "AI-Based Skin Cancer Inspection Device" that was simply a photograph of a Glock pistol, and a "robot chassis" copied from Disney's WALL-E. As IP law professor Sarah Fackrell put it, the scheme is "basically a double fraud — these people aren't inventors and these are not patents."

Why the scam runs through fast, unexamined registries

The agencies did not choose the UK by accident. Official fees for a UK design registration start at around £50, filings are processed in days, and the register asks no questions about who the "designers" really are. The same logic makes other unexamined or lightly examined routes attractive: advertisements documented by researchers also offered German, Australian, Canadian, Singaporean and other filings, plus copyright registrations — anything that produces an official-looking foreign certificate quickly.

It is worth saying plainly: there is no such thing as an "international patent." No single filing grants worldwide patent rights. The phrase exists in these advertisements precisely because it sounds impressive and cannot be checked against any one register — the hallmark of a claim designed for an appraisal form rather than for the real world.

Why Indian academics keep buying

The demand side is a points system. Under the UGC's Academic Performance Indicator framework, an "international patent" can be worth 10 points — more than a peer-reviewed research paper at 8. Patent counts also feed NIRF rankings, NAAC accreditation and ARIIA innovation scores, and many institutions set patent targets for faculty appraisal or make "IP output" a PhD expectation. The advertisements name these metrics explicitly — "useful for API, NAAC, NIRF, ARIIA" is part of the sales copy.

When the metric is a number and nobody verifies what stands behind it, a ₹4,000 certificate and a genuinely examined patent earn the same points. That is the market failure these agencies monetise — and it is why the burden has quietly shifted onto individual academics, because the registers that make the scheme cheap also make it permanently visible.

How discovery happens, and what it costs

Every design register involved is public. Anyone — a rival candidate, a journalist, a hiring committee, an academic-integrity researcher — can look up a registration number in seconds. The 2025 study that exposed the scheme did it at scale with image-matching software, clustering thousands of near-duplicate filings; the findings were then reported internationally, including in Times Higher Education. The pattern is now well known to anyone who screens CVs seriously.

For the academic, the downside is severe and one-sided:

• Misconduct exposure. Claiming inventorship of something you did not invent, on an appraisal or grant application, is a false statement to your employer or funder — the same category of offence as a purchased degree or a paper-mill publication.
• Reversal of benefits. Promotions, increments, PhD credits or awards earned on the strength of fake "patents" can be reviewed and withdrawn once the basis is shown to be false.
• A permanent public record. A retracted paper at least carries a notice; a design registration with your name on it cannot be quietly deleted from a foreign register. The evidence outlives the appraisal cycle it was bought for.
• Blackmail risk. Researchers warn that buyers hand a lever to the very firms they paid — who know exactly what was purchased, and whom to tell.

How to verify any "patent" claim in five minutes

Whether you are an academic checking what you have been offered, or a committee checking a CV, the test is the same:

• Ask for the number and the office. Every genuine right has a filing or grant number and an issuing office. "International patent" with no office named is already the answer.
• Look it up at the source. Indian patents on the Indian Patent Office's public register at ipindia.gov.in; international applications on WIPO PatentScope; European filings on Espacenet; UK rights on the UK IPO register; designs across offices on DesignView.
• Check what kind of right it is. The register itself will say "registered design" or "patent". A design certificate presented as a patent is a misrepresentation, full stop.
• Check application versus grant. A patent application is not a granted patent — inflating one into the other is the domestic cousin of this same scam.
• Ask what was examined. If the right was granted in days, nothing was examined. Speed is the tell.

What the real route looks like

A genuine patent is slower and more expensive than ₹4,000 precisely because it is worth something. In India, the road runs from a prior-art search and a properly drafted specification, through publication and substantive examination, to a grant that an examiner has actually tested — see our complete guide to patent registration costs in India. Protection abroad runs through the PCT route or direct national filings — real filings, in named offices, with examination. And design registration itself is a perfectly legitimate right when it is called what it is and protects a design you actually created: we file those too, honestly labelled — here is the design registration process end to end.

What universities and colleges should do

Institutions are not passive victims here — their metrics created the demand, and their verification can end it. Three changes close the loophole: verify before counting (every patent claim checked against the issuing office's register, by number, before it enters an appraisal or a NAAC/NIRF return); count grants, not certificates (an unexamined foreign design registration is not a "patent" in any internal scoring, and applications are not grants); and give faculty a legitimate route — an institutional IP policy, real training on what is patentable, and support to file properly for the work that deserves it. An institution that files ten genuine applications a year is stronger on every honest metric than one carrying a hundred ₹4,000 certificates it cannot defend.

How MYCrave can help

MYCrave Consultancy & Services has handled 22,000+ IPR filings and works with universities and colleges across India on exactly this problem: setting up institutional IP cells, training faculty and research scholars to tell real protection from purchased paper, auditing existing "patent" claims against official registers, and filing genuine patents, designs and trademarks with the right office under the right name. If your institution's IP numbers need to survive scrutiny — or your own CV does — we can help you build them the defensible way.

Frequently asked questions

Keep reading